Yes, I've tried Eclipse. I know it quite well: I've even written an Eclipse plugin and published a paper about it (Takaka: Eclipse Image Processing Plug-in) . But it does not work for me like emacs does. If Eclipse works for you: that is great. But I don't think it necessarily works for everyone. Emacs + JDEE IS my IDE for Java (and is other things as well).
And I have no interest in starting any editor war ('IDE war'?)
Before I actually tried Eclipse in a significant way, I thought that I was just unwilling to change due to the learning curve of something new, and the momentum of the 'known' and once I tried it I would find it better, like many other people seemd to (and certainly many of the pundits). But when I did invest in making the change, I discovered that was not the reason. It still didn't work as well for me as emacs (where 'work' for me meant helped my productivity: no, productivity was less than working using emacs). Again, this is not a criticism of Eclipse.
My theory is that - like learning, where it has been established that different people learn in different ways (Visual/Verbal, Visual/Nonverbal, Auditory/Verbal, Tactile/Kinesthetic) - I believe that particular modes of human-machine interaction are better suited to some individuals than others.
I am not an HCI expert, so I don't know if the various modes have been as clearly defined, delineated and validated as in learning, but I could imagine at least one HCI mode mapping to the Microsoft Word/NetBeans/Eclipse mode of mouse oriented, busy GUIs, and another to the emacs mode [I think I've poorly described the attributes of the former and won't attempt to describe the latter].
This all said, I found it quite interesting to find these two recent blog entries today:
With a little looking around, I found a couple more blog postings that capture some of the emacs-ness of emacs that might be of interest:
"I think that there is some confusion between mastering emacs, and using emacs. You can learn to use emacs in 1/2 an hour. Is that a shockingly long time? Yes. Great design usually makes its uses obvious.But emacs makes up for that initial investment with accelerating returns --- where Notepad, or even Eclipse, you stop gaining power and knowledge relatively quickly, emacs is like the universe: no matter how long you look at it, there is always more to learn --- and the best part is the more you learn, the faster you can learn more."- comment by Sam Bleckley on Learn Emacs in Ten Year post
- Alieniloquent: 'You can do this for any function in the system. Even the functions that get called when you hit individual keys. That is why Emacs is so powerful. It’s not an editor, it’s an environment'.
- Why emacs is still in my toolbelt
- The Case for Emacs
- Get Organized with Emacs Org-mode and Emacs Org mode video for the SourceForge Commmunity Choices Award 2009
- Quickly looking up words in Google through Emacs
- My life inside Emacs: Twitter
- 10 Specific Ways to Improve Your Productivity With Emacs 'The key to understanding Emacs is that it's all about efficiency, which includes economy of motion....IDEs also offer Refactoring tools, which are all the rage, because they help you automatically fix your screwed-up code. This is fine, as far as it goes, but I'll tell you a secret: Refactoring tools don't understand English. They won't help you one bit when you're doing something that the tools weren't designed to handle. Refactoring tools are cookie-cutter solutions; Emacs offers you a level of fine-grained control over your environment that makes you the equal of any editing challenge.'
- How I Wrote an Emacs Blog Client (And Lived to Tell the Tale)
- The Web Interface Is Morphing Into Emacs
- Debugging Android with emacs
- Got Emacs?: A graphical Tutorial of Emacs Rectangle commands