"Creative Commons / FLOSS-style licensing too restrictive for scientific data"

This article takes the provocative (but well-argued) position that Creative Commons / FLOSS -type licensing applied to scientific data is too restrictive and that the default licensing model for this data should be that it be in the public domain. The arguments are quite convincing: I think I may be convinced...

John Wilbanks. 2008. Public domain, copyright licenses and the freedom to integrate science. Journal of Science Communication 7 (2).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Java, MySql increased performance with Huge Pages

IBM on Linux: "Lean, clean, and green"

Mars Inc. Cacao Genome Database claims Open Access, public domain: falls short