Ranting about maps

Both as a Canadian who has enjoyed the rants of Rick Mercer and as someone who spent a lot of time working with geographers at the Atlas of Canada (and even enjoying some of it!), I am appreciating the convergence of these two things as embodied in the self-described rant by Martin Dodge and Chris Perkins (Reclaiming the map: British Geography and ambivalent cartographic practice )

In their rant, the Royal Geographical Society ("the heart of geography") is roasted for using a ("Mc-Map") Google Maps location map on the back of the RGS-IBG 2007 Annual International Conference programme.

While concerned with this and the apparent decline of mapping in geography (Geographers Don’t Map Anymore Do They?) and the sub-discipline of cartography (Cartographers: Who Needs Them Anymore?) I think their conclusion that mapping is actually easier and possibly better and making a popular and significant resurgence (Mapping Reinvigorated?) through mashups (including Google Maps), Open Source tools, open geographic data sets, etc is valid. Unfortunately --as they point out -- this amateur mapping is happening without the participation or even notice of -- (in this case, British) academics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Java, MySql increased performance with Huge Pages

Lucene concurrent search performance with 1,2,4,8 IndexReaders

Lucene indexing performance benchmarks for journal article metadata and full-text