Thursday, August 07, 2008

arXiv readership/citation bias examined

the scholarly kitchen has a very interesting discussion ("The importance of being first") that looks at the various biases impacting article readership at arXiv. Based on two recent articles[1,2], biases introduced by the email announcement schedule (sent out at 4PM North American Eastern Time) of arXiv (geographical bias) as well author game- or evolutionary theory strategies of self-promotion (Submit as close to 4pm so as to appear at the top of the email announcement, thus increasing readership...) can significantly change the readership and citation rate of an article. Interesting and clearly something that needs to be reduced/taken-in-to-account/monitored at similar sites.

I would be surprised if there weren't already EBay sniping-(bidding)-bot-like bots out there that can automatically submit articles to arXiv in the last 10 seconds of 4pm.

[1]Dietrich, J.P. (2008). The Importance of Being First: Position Dependent Citation Rates on arXiv:astro-ph. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 120(864), 224-228. DOI: 10.1086/527522

[2]Dietrich, J.P. (2008). Disentangling Visibility and Self-Promotion Bias in the arXiv:astro-ph Positional Citation Effect. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 120(869), 801-804. DOI: 10.1086/589836

No comments: